The Other Donald Duck Tax Propaganda Film
This is a documentary small done by Disney for the Department of the Treasury to encourage people to pay the “Victory Tax”.
The following is from: http://www.freedomclubusa.com/donald_duck_tax
A year after the United States entered the Second World War the federal government needed additional revenues to pay for the war effort. Congress had given away much of the government’s usual means of financing itself, printing its own money, when it made the Federal Reserve in 1913. A voluntary income tax had been in place for 29 years, but for Constitutional reasons, fewer than 11 percent of Americans had to pay the income tax at that time. As a result, Congress enacted into law the Victory Tax Act of 1942, which included concurrent law for automatic wage withholding. The Victory Tax was a direct tax on income. But Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution requires that direct taxes be apportioned to the several states, not citizens directly, and therefore it was unconstitutional. The government attempted to legitimize these new laws by citing Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2 of the Constitution: “To support Armies but no apportionment for money to that use shall be a longer term than 2 years.”
The new legislation gave Henry Morgenthau, then Secretary of the Treasury, two voluntary income taxes to which he needed the voluntary compliance of US citizens. In December 1942, Morgenthau came up with a brilliant thought to encourage Americans to volunteer to pay by making the income tax a patriotic duty. To help implement this thought, Morgenthau ordered John J. Sullivan, a Treasury Department official, to contact Walt Disney.
Remember there was no television in the early 40s. The only visual medium the government could use to reach the public were films at movie houses. Going to the movies was a well loved pastime, and citizens usually attended nearly every week. Walt was questioned to glide to D.C. to discuss an urgent special request. At first, Walt was reluctant, but Sullivan insisted. Sullivan did not tell the purpose of this meeting, and Walt umed it had to do with the promotion of War Bonds. The next day, when Mr. Disney arrived to meet with Morgenthau and Internal Revenue Commissioner Guy Helvering, it was announced that the U.S. wanted him to “help us sell people on paying the income tax.” Confused, Walt questioned why the government just didn’t jail people who did not pay the income tax. Mr. Helvering retorted, “Walt, we want people to be enthusiastic about paying their taxes.” Walt did not know that an unconstitutional income tax could not be used to jail American citizens for non-payment. That was then.
The Spirit Of ‘43 makes no mention of the impending “withholding” from workers’ paychecks, yet it is quite obviously intended to promote the desirability of withholding, if be it responsibly by oneself until quarterly payment came due. Beardsley Ruml, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of New York would later introduce pay-as-you-go tax withholding in the work place so citizens would never again be “caught small” on tax day.
The Same Voluntary Tax Remains Today.
The Victory Tax Act was renewed in 1944 and was to expire when the war was over, yet remains in effect today, codified under the Internal Revenue Code at code section 3402 in subtitle C – Wage and Employment Tax, not the “Income” Tax. When WWII was over, Washington simply could not let go of its newfound riches – the payroll tax the public had been conditioned to accept. The constitutionality of the Victory Tax Act was never challenged by the people of the United States. The psychology and influence [propaganda] developed in The Spirit of ‘43 through its use of surreal imagery and feelings of National Patriotism and civic duty to – as the narrator puts it… ” pay your taxes gladly and proudly” to fight an evil and powerful enemy, “The Axis” of Germany and Japan, accomplished its goal to get Americans to pay this voluntary tax. Any citizen questioning the tax might as well be considered the enemy by the end of this film clip. This should provide you some insights into how we have progressed to this modern state of voluntary complacency about our tax burden when our government tells us it is for our own excellent. And most of us are not even legally required to pay taxes. We have been convinced to pay taxes by practices that evolved out of cartoon propaganda and a sense of war-time patriotism. Careful examination of the law will show that the meaning of income is not legally defined to mean your income. Most people only become a taxpayer by volunteering to file a tax report or withholding form. And the IRS won’t tell you otherwise. No part of the Federal Government is constitutionally permitted to levy such a direct tax on citizens of States and no amendment to the Constitution has changed that, not even the 16th amendment.
…go to the website at the top for more information.
Duration : 0:3:47
[youtube dfwZNomxsNg]

AndroidPolitician …
AndroidPolitician wrote about me. “You signed a contract to enable this (the social contract)…”
You can’t produce my signature or the contract & I’m the f…ing idiot?!!! LOL I’ve read it & the Declaration of Independence many times. You should try at least once.
I guess by your failure to answer, you do advocate violence to get what you want.
Your right, I don’t argue. You never saw me coming.
Your a ing …
Your a ing idiot. The US constitution was based on a “social contract” look it up.
Fuck it, your hopless to argue with.
AndroidPolitician,
…
AndroidPolitician,
So you advocate legal armed robbery to fund your dreams, schemes, dreams, schemes, swimming pool, house addition, new car, children’s education, your food & water, wealth building, failures bailouts & other legal mischief?
Just a yes or no will do.
So the legal thief …
So the legal thief robber writes. [You signed a contract...]
Really?!!! I don’t have a copy of the agreement, would you point me in the right direction as to its location.
You signed a …
You signed a contract to enable this (the social contract) if you don’t like it you can leave to some other country that has zero taxes.
AndroidPolitician,
…
AndroidPolitician,
Would you dare question your neighbor to personally fund your dreams, schemes, swimming pool, house addition, new car, children’s education, your food & water? LOL
As a socialist though you would circumvent that by public stealing. The equivalent to get your neighbor to fund yours would be to point a gun at your neighbor. That’s what you do when you allow institutionalized stealing because there is no lawful obligation otherwise.
You become a legal armed robber; legal thief.
[Because America is ...
[Because America is based on a social contract.]
Really?!!! “The social contract” which you wish to shove down my throat is different then that which was agreed upon. It was agreed to be a Representative Republic based on the rule of law protecting first an foremost the individual freedom & liberty of people.
“Social contract” is a way for you to justify public stealing. It’s still stealing; period. It just makes you a legal thief.
Because America is …
Because America is based on a social contract.
Your provide payment in the form of taxes and the government provides police, military, roads etc.
What kind of …
What kind of freedom is that which requires free people to legally pay for anothers dreams, schemes, wants, desires, pleasures, wealth building, failures bailouts & other legal mischief when I cannot force my neighbor to pay for my dreams, schemes…?
HOW CAN THERE BE LAW OR COURTS OF LAW THAT PERMITS LEGAL STEALING & LEGAL SLAVERY?
ITS TIME TO BAND TOGETHER AND TELL THE LEGAL THIEVES WHOS IN CHARGE.
CAMPAIGNforLIBERTY*COM
RESTOREtheREPUBLIC*COM
TRUTHATTACK*ORG
Thanks, Scottieman2 …
Thanks, Scottieman2, for your comment.
Take a moment to read all of my comments here and you may find the solution you’re looking for!
I know taxes are …
I know taxes are here to help but at the same time we should pick where it goes. Not just in general terms. Plus, they shouldn’t tax the middle/lower class. Tax the rich people the billionare/millionare that can afford to have 15 classic cars 2 airplanes, 50 room mansions.
Taxes to fund both …
Taxes to fund both sides of the war!
America fights a …
America fights a total war. Donald has a taxable income of 1700 dollars and pay 13 dollars in income tax!
That’s not much considering the circumstances.
END THE FED AND THe …
END THE FED AND THe congress cant borrow money without asking. 100% of all the income goes to the fed and it goes to them for interest of the nationalo debt.
If there is no fed then there is no income tax or IRS. WAKE UP AMERICA AND END THE MOST EVIL ORGANIZATION OF ALL TIMES STEELING AND ENSLAVING THE PEOPLE OF ALL PROPERTY AND MONEY. VOTE FOR PEOPLE THAT SAID THAT THEY WILL END THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.
You are right that …
You are right that the medias obsession with Obama is becoming more and more stupid.
But I saw the same obsession the center-left has with Obama with Bush in the center-right/far-right. In both cases it was/is a “the leader can’t do incorrect”-attitude. They only difference to me is that only one of them claimed to work out gods will.
You are right in …
You are right in that the system was in place. The Messiah term for Obama is snide, but it comes from a combination of his supporter generated media & the reasoning for giving him support. He will solve all our problems because he is Obama, and not because he had a workable defined program.
Really: This …
Really: This started WAY before Bush II. Of course it probably will be a combination of this.
And by “Messiah” I ume you are speaking of Obama. I find this name amusing because it is mostly the right wing that names him this way. So far I haven’t heard anyone refer him with that phrase in a positive way. The basic argument behind this is that he is well loved.
Are those options? …
Are those options? Sound like inevitable outcomes ignited by Bush and fanned by the Messiah.
I hear you. The …
I hear you. The income tax is an excise tax on the privilege of using wealth to increase your wealth.
Working for a living and being compensated at market rates equally does not make income; it’s an even trade and our right to pursue happiness.
Wealth made from investing existing wealth is the Supreme Court’s definition of INCOME and our Constitution imposes a tax on the privilege of increasing, not just maintaining our wealth.
We need to educate the public about the LEGAL def of income!
Section 9 reads:
.. …
Section 9 reads:
…
No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.
You have three …
You have three options:
- Pay more taxes
- Cut the military budget
- Sell the future of your children to China.
Congress ….SHALL. …
Congress ….SHALL… is given “THE” POWER to coin money, DO THAY ?
telling that the …
telling that the gvt is depicted as a machine
Blob
Blob
Again, I’m …
Again, I’m concerned about your reading comprehension. There is nothing incorrect with the income tax. It is legal and appropriate. I was once caught up with the various theories why the tax was illegal, but extensive independent research pointed me in a different direction. No need to quote tax scripture to me, been there, done that a decade ago. Please read my other posts for my explanation re: the tax. Then use your degree to research it for yourself. Rebut then, not before. Peace.